1. 08 May, 2009 4 commits
  2. 07 May, 2009 2 commits
  3. 06 May, 2009 7 commits
  4. 05 May, 2009 4 commits
  5. 04 May, 2009 4 commits
  6. 03 May, 2009 1 commit
  7. 01 May, 2009 6 commits
  8. 29 Apr, 2009 1 commit
  9. 28 Apr, 2009 1 commit
  10. 26 Apr, 2009 1 commit
  11. 25 Apr, 2009 1 commit
  12. 24 Apr, 2009 1 commit
  13. 23 Apr, 2009 2 commits
  14. 22 Apr, 2009 1 commit
    • Carl-Daniel Hailfinger's avatar
      All "unknown xy SPI chip" entries claim to have status UNTESTED for probe/read/erase/write · 42882fd9
      Carl-Daniel Hailfinger authored
      
      That is incorrect.
      
      A bit of confusion comes from how the #defines are named. We call them
      TEST_BAD_*, but the message printed by flashrom says: "This flash part
      has status NOT WORKING for operations:"
      
      Something that is unimplemented is definitely not working.
      
      Neither of the chip entries mentioned above has erase or write functions
      implemented, so erase and write are not working. Since their size is
      unknown, we can't read them in. That means read is not working as well.
      Probing is a different matter. If a chip-specific probe function had
      matched, we wouldn't have to handle the chip with the "unknown xy SPI
      chip" fallback. I'm tempted to call that "not working" as well, but I'm
      open to discussion on this point.
      
      Corresponding to flashrom svn r439 and coreboot v2 svn r4177.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarCarl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
      Acked-by: default avatarUwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
      42882fd9
  15. 21 Apr, 2009 3 commits
  16. 20 Apr, 2009 1 commit