GitLab

Some SPI opcodes need to be sent in direct succession after each other
without any chip deselect happening in between. A prominent example is
WREN (Write Enable) directly before PP (Page Program). Intel calls the
first opcode in such a row "preopcode".

Right now, we ignore the direct succession requirement completely and it
works pretty well because most onboard SPI masters have a timing or
heuristics which make the problem disappear.
The FT2232 SPI flasher is different. Since it is an external flasher,
timing is very different to what we can expect from onboard flashers and
this leads to failure at slow speeds.

This patch allows any function to submit multiple SPI commands in a
stream to any flasher. Support in the individual flashers isn't
implemented yet, so there is one generic function which passes the each
command in the stream one-by-one to the command functions of the
selected SPI flash driver.
Tested-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>

Corresponding to flashrom svn r645.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker@gmail.com>

Make a few local functions in sb600spi.c static.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r623.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Luc Verhaegen <libv@skynet.be>

That means you can tell flashrom to read exactly bytes 12345-56789
(start 12345, length 44445) and it will not fetch a single byte more.

Uwe tested this on one LPC, one SPI, and one parallel flash board.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r596.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>

And even when it checks if the erase worked, the result of that check is
often ignored.

Convert all erase functions and actually check return codes
almost everywhere.
Check inside all erase_* routines if erase worked, not outside.
erase_sector_jedec and erase_block_jedec have changed prototypes to
enable erase checking.

Uwe successfully tested LPC on an CK804 box and SPI on some SB600 box.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r595.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Urja Rannikko <urjaman@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>

This was partly due to a design problem in the abstraction layer.

There should be exactly two different functions for reading SPI chips:
- memory mapped reads
- SPI command reads.

Each of them should be contained in a separate function, optionally
taking parameters where needed.

This patch solves the problems mentioned above, shortens the code and
makes the code logic a lot more obvious.

Since open-coding the min() function leads to errors, include it in this
patch as well.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r589.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>

Right now, the annotation only differentiates between SPI and non-SPI.
Anyone who knows more about a specific flash chip should feel free to
update it.

The existing flashbus variable was abused to denote the SPI controller
type. Use an aptly named variable for that purpose.

Once this patch is merged, the chipset/programmer init functions can set
supported flash chip types and flashrom can automatically select only
matching probe/read/erase/write functions. A side benefit of that will
be the elimination of the Winbond W29EE011 vs. AMIC A49LF040A conflict.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r556.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>

Some MMIO accesses used volatile, others didn't (and risked
non-execution of side effects) and even with volatile, some accesses
looked dubious.

Since the MMIO accessor functions and the onboard flash accessor
functions are functionally identical (but have different signatures),
make the flash accessors wrappers for the MMIO accessors.

For some of the conversions, I used Coccinelle. Semantic patch follows:

@@ typedef uint8_t; expression a; volatile uint8_t *b; @@ - b[a] + *(b
+ a) @@ expression a; volatile uint8_t *b; @@ - *(b) |= (a); + *(b) =
*(b) | (a); @@ expression a; volatile uint8_t *b; @@ - *(b) = (a); +
mmio_writeb(a, b); @@ volatile uint8_t *b; @@ - *(b) + mmio_readb(b) @@
type T; T b; @@ ( mmio_readb | mmio_writeb ) (..., - (T) - (b) + b )

Corresponding to flashrom svn r524.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>

Uwe tested read, write, erase with this patch on a random board to make
sure nothing breaks.
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>

Build-tested on 32bit x86.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r521.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>

Change SPI architecture to handle 1-byte chunk chip writing differently
from 256-byte chunk chip writing.

Annotate SPI chip write functions with _256 or _1 suffix denoting the
number of bytes they write at maximum.

The 1-byte chunk writing is cut-n-pasted to different SPI drivers right
now. A later patch can move them to the generic spi_chip_write_1.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r485.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>

Until the ICH SPI driver can handle preopcodes as standalone opcodes,
we should handle such special opcode failure gracefully on ICH and
compatible chipsets.

This fixes chip erase on almost all ICH+VIA SPI masters.

Thanks to Ali Nadalizadeh for helping track down this bug!

Corresponding to flashrom svn r484.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>

Add missing copyright year.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r428 and coreboot v2 svn r4107.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>

Corresponding to flashrom svn r354 and coreboot v2 svn r3782.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <Qingpei.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe, Bao <Zheng.Bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>

This has been tested by Uwe Hermann on an RS690/SB600 board.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r351 and coreboot v2 svn r3779.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <Qingpei.Wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>