From 92d4dda3332577bc2228b8d436f3d2796c59a520 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:38:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Fix comment in kernel/irq.c kernel/irq.c contains a comment that speaks of -1 and -2 as interrupt numbers, but this is actually dependent on configuration options now. Replace by NO_IRQ and NO_IRQ_ENABLED. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c index 34dc37e0e369..919fbf568495 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c @@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs) /* * Every platform is required to implement ppc_md.get_irq. - * This function will either return an irq number or -1 to + * This function will either return an irq number or NO_IRQ to * indicate there are no more pending. - * The value -2 is for buggy hardware and means that this IRQ - * has already been handled. -- Tom + * The value NO_IRQ_IGNORE is for buggy hardware and means that this + * IRQ has already been handled. -- Tom */ irq = ppc_md.get_irq(); -- GitLab