-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Having a 4 byte register at 0x321b seems unlikely as that's not 4 byte aligned. Since later platforms have more or less the same FBC registers with new names, assume that FBC_FENCE_OFF is at 0x3218 just like DPFC_FENCE_YOFF. This feels like a simple typo in BSpec. 321Bh looks a lot like 3218h after all. Should still be tested on real hardware of course. But I don't have any mobile gen4 systems. Signed-off-by:
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by:
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>f64f1726