Unfortunately, EN29F002T, EN29F002AT, EN29F002ANT, EN29F002NT all have exactly the same ID

Improve model number printing.

Add EN29F002(A)(N)B support while I'm at it.

Corresponding to flashrom svn r172 and coreboot v2 svn r3031.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Markus Boas <bios@ryven.de>

flash.h

@@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ extern struct flashchip flashchips[];
 #define EN_29F040A		0x7F04
 #define EN_29LV010		0x7F6E
 #define EN_29LV040A		0x7F4F	/* EN_29LV040(A) */
-#define EN_29F002AT		0x7F92
-#define EN_29F002AB		0x7F97
+#define EN_29F002T		0x7F92
+#define EN_29F002B		0x7F97
 
 #define FUJITSU_ID		0x04	/* Fujitsu */
 /* MBM29F400TC_STRANGE has a value not mentioned in the data sheet and we

flashchips.c

@@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
 	 probe_jedec,	erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
 	{"At49F002(N)T",ATMEL_ID,	AT_49F002NT,	256, 256,
 	 probe_jedec,	erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
-	/* The EN29F002AT can do byte program at arbitrary boundaries. */
-	{"EN29F002AT",	EON_ID,		EN_29F002AT,	256, 256,
+	{"EN29F002(A)(N)T",	EON_ID,	EN_29F002T,	256, 256,
+	 probe_jedec,	erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
+	{"EN29F002(A)(N)B",	EON_ID,	EN_29F002B,	256, 256,
 	 probe_jedec,	erase_chip_jedec, write_jedec},
 	{"MBM29F400TC",	FUJITSU_ID,	MBM29F400TC_STRANGE,	512, 64 * 1024,
 	 probe_m29f400bt, erase_m29f400bt, write_linuxbios_m29f400bt},